Kitchen Literacy: The Perfect Read For a Retrovore

KitThe subtitle of Ann Vileisis’s Kitchen Literacy says it all: How We Lost Knowledge of Where Food Comes From and Why We Need to Get It Back. Vileisis, a historian who also happens to be a passionate cook and gardener, documents the American diet’s evolution from an era when we were all locavores by necessity to the over-processed predicament that industrial agriculture’s boxed us into now.

Vileisis whisks us back to the late eighteenth century via the diaries of a woman named Martha Ballard, a midwife in Maine who grew most of her family’s food, made her own bread, butter, and cheese, and took for granted such unappetizing tasks as twisting the neck of a turkey. Ballard’s detailed notes about her vegetable garden, the animals she raised or bartered for, and the meals she made of them, evoke a connection to land and livestock that most of us couldn’t imagine today.

That we abandoned an agrarian way of life ages ago and wound up outsourcing the production of our food to a bunch of businessmen hell bent on fattening us up like feedlot cattle is not news. What’s fresh--and fascinating--about Kitchen Literacy is Vileisis’s thorough account of the factors behind this terrible transition.

Food manufacturers were already extolling the virtues of processed food products by the late nineteenth century, but wary women resisted the shift from fresh foods they could see, touch, and smell to mysterious canned goods “with their distinctly concealing tin armor.”

Their worst fears were confirmed by canned goods whose contents turned out to be adulterated, rotted or toxic. In 1874, a reporter for the Chicago Times took a batch of brand-name canned and packaged foods to a high school chemistry teacher’s lab for analysis and discovered that much of it contained sawdust. Food manufacturers struggled to perfect their canning methods and created all kinds of hazards in the process: toxic metals that were used to seal lids leached into the contents; fruits and vegetables lacking that “fresh-picked” look had their color “enhanced” by bleach additives and coal-tar dyes; putrefied molasses that exploded when opened, and so on.

How the food producers survived this rocky start and gradually won over skeptical shoppers is a study in marketing, and Vileisis provides some great graphics and ad copy to show how this was accomplished. A 1919 ad touting the virtues of Del Monte’s canned fruits and vegetables manages to offend Ethicurean sensibilities on two fronts at once: “The DEL MONTE can is a magic container that annihilates distance and merges all seasons into one long fruitful summer.” So much for counting your food miles and eating seasonally.

Another ad from Carnation Milk circa 1913 depicted “contented cows” grazing on “green grass the year round on the North Pacific Coast”--an uncanny precursor to Horizon’s “happy cows.” Like Horizon, whose certified organic status has been the subject of much controversy, Carnation turned out to be keeping its cows in somewhat less idyllic conditions than the “verdant pastures interlaced by sparkling streams and backed by the snow-capped mountains that showed up in the ads,” Vileisis writes.

The ads aroused the suspicion of Dr. Harvey Wiley, a chemist who was instrumental in passing the federal Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906 and had served as chief chemist at the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Chemistry (predecessor to the FDA). When Wiley attempted to verify Carnation’s claims, he discovered that the company had no herds of its own, but relied instead on two hundred dairy farmers from various parts of the country “who, as far as Wiley could tell, hauled their milk with no particular attention to sanitation. When he visited one nearby farm, he saw cows “so plastered with manure…so upholstered with filth” that he could “hardly tell their color.””

Another all-too-familiar scenario is the FDA’s recurring role as agribiz ally, repeatedly coddling food industry titans at the expense of consumers. Vileisis documents the rapid rise of DDT as a pesticide after World War II and cites evidence that the health hazards of DDT were obvious to FDA researchers, farmers, and others for decades before the EPA finally moved to ban it in 1972 after Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring publicized the problem.

Vilesis describes the “covenant of ignorance” that allowed consumers to blithely buy all kinds of dubious food products:

Food manufacturers did not want to be pestered by careful scrutiny of their ever-changing production methods. Through innovation and efficiencies of vertical integration, they had cut waste, boosted profits, and delivered a wide variety of modern, hygienic food products to supermarket shelves. And housewives did not want to be bothered with knowing the details; it was precisely the unknowing aspect of the emerging food system that reduced time in both shopping and cooking…

Michael Pollan targets this same don’t-wanna-know mindset in the “How to Eat” passage of his new book, In Defense of Food. In entreating us to eat slowly and deliberately, Pollan explains why ignorance is essential to the enjoyment of fast-food:

The fast-food hamburger has been brilliantly engineered to offer a succulent and tasty first bite, a bite that in fact would be impossible to enjoy if the eater could accurately picture the feedlot and the slaughterhouse and the workers behind it or knew anything about the “artificial grill flavor” that made that first bite so convincing.

Kitchen Literacy is, in fact, the perfect book for anyone who appreciates Pollan’s work but longs for a more in-depth study of how our food chain got so twisted in the first place. In the book’s final chapters, Vileisis cites the rise of farmers’ markets, CSAs, and consumer demand for organic foods as indications that the tide is finally turning and Americans are beginning to rethink our dysfunctional food system:

In one sense, knowledge about foods has deepened and advanced enormously as experts have learned more and more, yet in another, popular knowledge about foods has become superficial as the great majority of us have come to depend on the unsteady grounds of advertising to know about what we eat. Procuring food has become much easier, but knowing about our foods has become much harder, especially as more and more of them come from distant lands.

Vileisis’s proposed cures for our warped culinary culture echo those of Pollan and all the other activist foodies: buy local and organic if you can, eat seasonally, avoid processed foods and factory farm meats and dairy, and take an interest in our government’s agricultural and environmental policies.

But Kitchen Literacy offers more than the by-now familiar road map for retrovores who want to know where and how their food is grown. At a time when Americans are so starved for insight about how to eat that In Defense of Food is already #7 on Amazon in its first week, Kitchen Literacy provides a cautionary culinary tale of how we got so far off the eaten path in the first place.

nice blogging.do carry on

nice blogging.do carry on for such stuff Custom Kitchen i greatly appreciate your effort Kitchen Cabinet the blog is really interesting and somewhat unique Kitchen Remodeling thanks for sharing it Kitchen Designers
Kind regards. Kitchen Doors

If we want a resilient and

If we want a resilient and diverse food universe going forward, we will have to find ways to counteract those globalizing pressures. Kitchen Literacy arms us for understanding the background of the battle. It is our responsibility to create the alternatives for the future.

pearl jewelry

You're correct that it was

You're correct that it was the EPA that banned the use of DDT; however, according to Vileisis, the FDA actually monitored the use of DDT by farmers quite closely, along with the USDA. Thanks for catching the error so I could fix it...
»

mpcoc

What’s fresh--and

What’s fresh--and fascinating--about Kitchen Literacy is Vileisis’s thorough account of the factors behind this terrible transition.

mpcoc

Now,if we could just get

Now,if we could just get more folks to consider growing their own food and/or creating neighbor to neighbor style co-ops(you grow tomatoes and I'll grow potatoes)we might get farther away from industrialized food faster. A nice side effect might be healing and restoring broken communities.

Those who don't understand history repeat it:)

I really loved Kitchen Literacy for its ability to bring together the diverse threads of modernization as they influenced food in the home. The incremental nature of the changes over time and the way those changes have been woven into the "covenant of ignorance" are profoundly difficult to unwind. But if we don't understand the pressures that led us to the current world, we will be ill equipped to change the course.
The national (and now global) food marketplace and its mechanisms for exposing and exploiting food arbitrage opportunities will rapidly find ways to subvert or neutralize the "local" movement if we are not careful, much like it has already reduced the value of terms like "natural" and "organic". If we want a resilient and diverse food universe going forward, we will have to find ways to counteract those globalizing pressures. Kitchen Literacy arms us for understanding the background of the battle. It is our responsibility to create the alternatives for the future.

FDA and DDT

Actually, FDA has almost nothing to do with DDT. USDA sets standards for how much DDT can be in food; the "ban" in 1972 was a ban on broadcast spraying on crops, and it was implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency, not FDA.

Sounds like a great book, apart from a few tiny nits like that.

thanks for the correction

You're correct that it was the EPA that banned the use of DDT; however, according to Vileisis, the FDA actually monitored the use of DDT by farmers quite closely, along with the USDA. Thanks for catching the error so I could fix it...