Sign up for updates in your city.
Living Liberally Blog
Living Liberally Blog
Submitted by Jen Johnson on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 2:00pm.
Jay Hazen sent us this list of flavor names supposedly submitted to Ben & Jerry's for a Bush themed ice cream. Comment with your favorite one or submit your own!
- Grape Depression
- The Housing Crunch
- Abu Grape
- Cluster Fudge
- Nut'n Accomplished
- Good Riddance You Lousy Motherfu***r... Swirl
- Iraqi Road
- Chock 'n Awe
- Impeach Cobbler
- Heck of a Job, Brownie!
- Neocon Politan
- RockyRoad to Fascism
- The Reese's-cession
- Cookie D'oh!
- Nougalar Proliferation
- Death by Chocolate... and Torture
- Freedom Vanilla Ice Cream
- Chocolate Chip On My Shoulder
- Credit Crunch
- Mission Pecanplished
- Country Pumpkin
- Chunky Monkey in Chief
- Chocolate Chimp
- Bloody Sundae
- Caramel Preemptive Stripe
- I broke the law and am responsible for the deaths of thousands . . . with nuts
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 12:03pm.
Submitted by Jen Johnson on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 4:09pm.
Prince Harry has been all over the headlines lately. Last week we--and he--learned that his five-year relationship with girlfriend, Chelsea Davy ended after Chelsea announced it on Facebook. Only weeks before that, footage of the Prince calling a fellow army cadet "Paki" was released. And today, we got our hands on the Royal's very own personal diary, which foreshadows much of the Prince's offensive behavior. The entries below from January 2005 bring us into the mind of a Nazi-uniform-sporting Prince. Come back next week for more entries from our exclusive series, The Prince Harry Diaries.
I am so excited from my mate's birthday. My friend, who is also named Harry, is turning 22 and his dad Richard Meade is throwing the party. It's a costume party. And the theme is bloody brilliant: Colonials and natives. I don't know what to be. The possibilities are endless... I could go in black face as an African. Maybe like a Congolese dude. Oooh, I'll see if William will dress up as King Leopold and hold a pair of fake hands. I would somehow have to create stumps for my hands. That would be fantastic. Or we could be an apartheid duo... What else... I could be an Indian (feather, not dot) and William could be an American and could carry a blanket and I could have pox all over my body. Of course a dot Indian and a British character would really hit home, and grandmama would love it. She always says that if we were still looking after India, "those pakis and wogs" wouldn't be killing each other.
I'll talk to Will. He loves this stuff. His own 21st birthday party was set to the theme of "Out of Africa." Maybe my cousin, Princess Michael wants to come. She would absolutely loooove the theme. She once told some loud and uppity blacks "You need to go back to the colonies." I wish I had been there to see it!
Submitted by Justin Krebs on Mon, 02/02/2009 - 2:32pm.
The values are all there: teamwork; fairplay; a transparent and honest judiciary. By many counts, sports embody liberal values.
So why does it seem like pro sports -- and its apotheosis, last night's Superbowl -- are the domain of conservative thinking? Is it the martial posturing (although, despite the on-field pre-game presence of David Petraeus, the NFL does claim it's moving away from military metaphors? Is it the culture of excessive consumerism embodied in the ads? Is it the machismo that sometimes resembles an anti-woman ethos (and has led to Superbowl Sunday having a horrid reputation for spousal abuse)?
And yet, there's Bard for the Blue Collar, the Boss himself, at the halftime show...surely Liberals should think twice before giving this ground over to the other side.
How did you mark yesterday? We know friends who had anti-Super Bowl outings to the movies, or nice dinners. But here in New York City, just as many liberals were finding ways to watch (grass-fed sliders, anyone?) and liberal reasons to root (Pennsylvania voted Obama, so Steelers were preferred; on the other hand, you gotta love the underdogs, so there was an argument for the Cardinals).
What was your reasoning?
We've reclaimed our bars...we've reclaimed our capital...now let's reclaim the NFL.
Submitted by Jen Johnson on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 7:16pm.
The first Friday after Inauguration, I was catching up with a close friend from college. We had planned on watching Inauguration coverage and celebrating together in New York, but at the last minute I decided to go to D.C. and join millions at the National Mall.
“It was so exciting,” I gushed. “I felt such a sense of community and collective joy.” I recapped my day: Struggling through to find a way into the Mall; watching Obama speak to us all on a monitor near the Washington Monument with the Capital Building in the distance. When Senator Feinstein spoke of this transition of power, I cried. Did I believe in democracy again?
I asked my college buddy, who spent the day with her family, what she thought of Obama’s speech.
“I couldn’t bear to watch it.”
When I asked her why, she said: “I want to be hopeful, but I’m afraid.”
I nodded. My own troubling thoughts and feelings had returned as well: Has anything actually changed? Are people energized, or are they exhausted? Does progressive politics stop with Obama’s election?
At last night’s Nation/Air America event, “Change For America? Obama & Progressives After January 20,” I found out what some of the progressive elite think.
To my relief, all of the speakers acknowledged and identified our fears. Obama could fail to meet our soaring expectations. Our goals might be ignored in favor of pressing economic and military concerns. And – perhaps most troubling - the grassroots might be as exhausted as I was on Inauguration Day.
For each fear, they asked us instead to rally to the promise we made ourselves during the campaign: Hope.
Opening remarks were made by co-moderator Mark Green. The 2001 Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City and president of Air America Radio introduced us to the event with some lighthearted jokes, a comparison between Obama and Jed Bartlet of NBC’s The West Wing, and a more serious image: that “the way to keep government upright is to lean on it from all sides.”
After her introduction by Green, Nation editor and co-moderator Katrina vanden Heuvel urged the audience to approach the coming months and years from a bottom-up standpoint: Instead of asking how Obama or his administration are doing, ask “How are we [the people] doing?” This simple shift of focus, she explained, enables us to set the terms of the debate and define the new Center, rather than allowing the government to do so.
Retaking the podium, Green encouraged us to think of our current political moment in historic terms. He called to mind the 20th century’s touchstones of political transformation: the landslide elections of FDR and Lyndon Johnson in 1933 and 1965.
Eli Pariser, Executive Director of MoveOn.org, began the panel by encouraging us to keep hope alive. He reminded us that the movement that elected Obama was created by us; not the campaign. Pariser’s antidote for the mounting fear? To focus political energy on people-to-people connections instead of the isolating, panic-loving media.
Next, prominent political journalist William Greider suggested that since progressives are being largely excluded from the administration, our role should be even more focused on grassroots mobilization. Greider’s top issue was bringing an end to the corporate state by reforming the Federal Reserve system.
On the more administration-focused side of things, Patricia J. Williams insisted that we aren’t post-race, and Lawrence Korb prepared us for the daunting foreign policy debate that lies ahead.
The panelists were as realistic as they were energetic; I left the conference anxious about the same dilemmas with which I entered. I thought of all the voters who may continue expressing their patriotism only on Election Day; of the unproductive partisanship that persists within my own family; of how fleeting the victories of 1933 and 1965 were.
But I also felt something new: Determination to sustain a progressive movement beyond an election, beyond a time of crisis, and into the fabric of American life.
Submitted by Justin Krebs on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 8:53am.
Both parties helped to bail out the banks,
Crossing the aisle, the Prez compromises
And now having passed with just Dems,
Does the GOP prefer burning down to building up?
Or they may just not care about regular Americans
Who ever said a new President would make this all easy?
Come share your thoughts, a booth & a pitcher or 3
Submitted by Stuart Peterson on Fri, 01/23/2009 - 5:24pm.
For those of you who were not there this past Sunday night at the Living Liberally Inaugural Ball you should really consider not missing more events by us! Imagine walking into a three-story club to find a group of 400 liberals listening to Jim Dean talk about the future of our country! Imagine the drink tickets being traded for cocktails! Think of the politicos and interesting liberals that could now be your friends. It was truly an incredible Inaugural Ball.
Along with Jim Dean's call to action, other local politicos got up to speak to the crowd. State Senator Daniel Squadron spoke about his hopes for a progressive future. City Council Member Bill deBlasio talked to the group about his campaign for Public Advocate and continued the talk of the future of progressive politics not just in New York City, but nationally.
Pictures after the jump...
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 01/22/2009 - 6:12pm.
As we dive head-long into these first 100 days of the Obama administration, we can't help but think of just how whirl-wind the last few months have been - seeing the Obama candidacy become the Obama administration-in-waiting become, as of Noon EST this past Tuesday, the Obama Presidency. By our count, there are 208 Drinking Liberally weeks to go before we do this whole Inauguration thing over again, and we wanted something special to remember this special time by - so we announced our quest for the Official Unofficial Drink of the Obama administration, and opened it up to your suggestions, awaiting some brilliant names and ideas.
And boy, did our chapters deliver - we received many dozen spectacular, hilarious, original, clever, and, even moving Drink recipes sent to us via e-mail, our website, blog comments on Open Left and Daily Kos, and even in-person suggestions. (Let's just say that people can be very open about their ideas at a Drinking Liberally meeting.) Some of you called on Obama's multifaceted heritage, putting together elegant multicultural concoctions which you might think wouldn't work, but do. Others got all punny, asking us to celebrate with humor the fact that Bush was gone and the Obama years had commenced.
Submitted by Justin Krebs on Thu, 01/22/2009 - 9:47am.
With a short speech on renewing America,
Even before orders to close Guantanamo,
And yet, within those same first minutes of joy,
We all talk about a President's first 100 days.
So let's dust ourselves off & restore America.
But first, how about a drink?
Submitted by Justin Krebs on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:39pm.
But what, exactly, will we be liberally drinking?
Many of our chapters offered suggestions for the Official Unofficial Drink of the Obama Presidency. But now we need to hear from you: which is the winner?
We'll be announcing it on Monday, in time for you to make sure your local bartender is ready to brew it up. Tell us in the comments thread what'll quench your thirst.
The Spartanburg, SC, chapter held their own competition and here were some of their candidates:
"Yes We Caffiene"
Team of Rivals:
"How Sweet it Is"
Obama Mama II:
Barack O-Pom-a (Same name, different drink)
Finally, the sunrise represent a new dawn, which is what our country needs right now."
Chocolate covered Cherry
And some classics from Liberal Mixology:
Barack on the Beach
Remember, what we drink is up to you. Let us know. You have the power. Yes, we can...drink liberally.
Chapter leaders... Please login here.